Talk:Panomics
Add topicLatest comment: 5 years ago by Klbrain in topic Merge proposal
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The content of the Panomics page was merged into Multiomics on 9 January 2021, and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article, please see its history. |
History
[edit]It would be useful to add when the name was coined; and who did so where. Right now this information is quite lacking in this article.
I heard the term only recently myself in a systems biology course. 80.110.95.98 (talk) 21:20, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Merge proposal
[edit]In February it was proposed to merge the synonyms Multiomics and Panomics. That's a great idea, as these are clearly synonyms. Even better would be to merge both to a section, perhaps headed Multiomics, on Physiology, as it seems that these terms are just neologisms for that long-standing concept. I suggest merging the two first, then discussing what might be a more contentious proposal to Physiology. Klbrain (talk) 12:45, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- I agree with the merge to Multiomics, I don't think that that would be contentious. IMO this might just be along the lines of "aka panomics" (with ASCO ref) in the first sentence of the Multiomics article. I assume a redirect from Panomics to Multiomics would be a part of that. Not so sure about the merge to Physiology, Multiomics seems enough of its own thing to me, anyway. Amkilpatrick (talk) 13:04, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Merge completed Klbrain (talk) 14:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)