Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a224080c1bd5ee28

Jump to content

Talk:Paleolithic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Efkinitos in topic Typo

Vincent W. Fallio

[edit]

I think this article needs to be culled of the information and theories sourced from Vincent W. Fallio. He doesn't seem to be a reputable scholar in the field, and his book that's cited often here is not published by a reputable press. Thoughts? NealBhattacharya (talk) 20:56, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Discussion at Talk:Neolithic § Why not "Neolithic era" or "Neolithic age"

[edit]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Neolithic § Why not "Neolithic era" or "Neolithic age". —GoldRingChip 14:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

undeniable things about the population in Africa and Middle east in the Paleolithic

[edit]

https://archaeologie.bemerkenswelt.de/en this is ground-breaking stuff, the images are satellite imagery from Google Earth so there's no doubt about that, it has placemarks of all stone age formations in Africa and Middle east! TL;DR Africa and Middle east were far more populated. Implement this large chunk of knowledge somewhere on the page, maybe even in a theories section! I hope the idea gets to the scientific community so they can research it more.. 178.221.182.108 (talk) 10:22, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

That looks like a very unreliable source and I doubt we can use it. The majority of the images on that page are of desert kites, which are well-studied and which we have a good article on, and keyhole monuments (monuments en trou de serrure), which we don't have an article on (yet) but are also known and dated. Neither are Palaeolithic, nor signs of particularly high population densities in the past. Joe (talk) 11:42, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yes - the site is fun, but on a non-exhaustive look it doesn't claim anything about the Paleolithic anyway. Indeed, all comments I saw about dating were admirably vague and cautious. Johnbod (talk) 12:17, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


fair point  Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.220.205.235 (talk) 07:22, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

References problems (February 2025)

[edit]

refrence 1 is a book that the website costs money to see so it can't be a reference and reference 18 is not working. Latin clash (talk) 05:19, 8 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Typo

[edit]

Under the Other Inventions sub-heading at the end of the first paragraph it says "....60 km of open ocean at 30,000 BCcal." which I believe should read "....60 km of open ocean at 30,000 BC." Efkinitos (talk) 16:58, 20 February 2025 (UTC)Reply