Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a234c4846999910d

Jump to content

Talk:Paint Branch

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Sullidav in topic Subwatershed?

Fix needed for sense

[edit]

Under "Watershed characteristics," these two sentences are badly written and do not make sense:

"The areas along Maryland's route 29, the intersection of Sandy Spring Road, and Columbia Pike in Burtonsville, Maryland have undergone extensive commercial development. Contrasting this, counties that border the watershed's southern-flowing direction (Montgomery and Prince George's), offer the least amount of developed areas"

Sentence 1 - structure of the road list does not make sense. If it is meant as a 2-item list (1 - rte 29 & 2 - intersection of SS&CP) the comma is wrong and "areas along" does not make sense for an intersection. If it is meant as a 3-item list (1-rte 29, 2-SS, 3-CP) the "intersection of" is wrong. Also is "in Burtonsville" applicable to the whole list or just the last item, whether that is either SS&CP intersection or CP?

Sentence 2 - The watershed does not flow in any direction. Counties do not border a direction. Montgomery and P.G. are the counties that contain the watershed, not counties that border it. Those counties are covered by the last sentence. And the contrast from the previous sentence is unclear - some areas are more developed and others are not, but it's unclear what is where.

I would delete this but if somebody who understands the intent can rewrite it, that would be better. Thx. Sullidav (talk) 18:52, 20 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Subwatershed?

[edit]

Another thing, the article should be consistent about whether Paint Branch has a "watershed" or a "subwatershed." I have no idea which word is right, but switching back and forth between the two different names - that are incompatible with each other - for the same thing as if it is two different things is wrong and confusing. Pick one name and use it consistently. Sullidav (talk) 02:52, 21 July 2025 (UTC)Reply