Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a449d104cd1364c2

Jump to content

Talk:Pageant Material

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 hours ago by Zzz plant in topic GA Reassessment
Former good articlePageant Material was one of the Music good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 12, 2026Good article nomineeListed
October 2, 2026Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
Result: Delisted. Zzz plant (talk) 14:45, 2 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Per this thread, this article has been reverted back to a state before the GA was conducted. A GAR is warranted in this case. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:03, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for enacting the GAR, Bgsu98.
  • Delist. The problem with this article is that LLM tools were used to expand it beginning on March 13, 2026. Also, I identified a copyright violation of the too-close paraphrasing variety, and I'm worried more will appear the deeper I look. The LLM tools likely introduced AI hallucinations, and for certain the wording and phrasing was selected by machine. The page must be delisted from GA status.
If someone wishes to rebuild it, they should do so without using the wording that was inserted by Camilasdandelions. Binksternet (talk) 19:00, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I saw where you had (rightly) reverted it back to a version from before the GA review was done. Therefore, the GA needs to most definitely be struck. Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:26, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Delist: Like mentioned before, information seems hallucinated from an AI, gotta get rid of that. Gdshordy (talk) 06:10, 19 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Delist - Someone should have a look at the three "featured" articles and these other articles that have been passed for GA. Doubt the original reviewers were aware they specifically have to check for AI usage.--NØ 06:30, 22 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.