Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects
Paederus is within the scope of WikiProject Beetles, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to beetles. For more information, visit the project page.BeetlesWikipedia:WikiProject BeetlesTemplate:WikiProject Beetlesbeetle
Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Blister beetles and the ten plagues
Really?! What archaeological or independent historical attestation do they have that the ten plagues were a real event, and not just a mythic/moralic symbol for a more profound religious truth, that cannot be interpreted scientifically. I don't think science, religion, nor wikipedia profits from repeating this kind of pseudoscientific crap. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 18:36, 10 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
First, these are not blister beetles, they are rove beetles. Second, it would be quite a WP:COATRACK digression for this article to get into a scientific debate with the authors of a scientific paper in Lancet, whose point is that public misfortunes similar to those described in Exodus could have been caused by Paederus. Anybody who clicks the wikilink from this article to ten plagues of Egypt can read there enormous skepticism about who did what to whom way back when and etc. Sharktopustalk18:59, 10 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
