Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23b2e0b0c8b5e44

Jump to content

Talk:Pacific blockade

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Jim.henderson in topic Gunboat diplomacy

Do not delete

[edit]

I don't have time to review it now, but a number of 19th century international law scholars (possibly early 20th century) dealt with this subject enough to make it notable (once notable, always notable). Though my understanding is it is of historical interest, not current. I've added the International Relations/Law banner as it falls into that area. IMHO (talk) 23:17, 30 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Recent examples?

[edit]

what is recent examples of pacific blockade?

There was some talk in the US cabinet during the Cuban Missile Crisis of reviving this doctrine, but they decided to term their actions against Cuba then a "quarantine" instead.John Z (talk) 05:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Gunboat diplomacy

[edit]

Isn't this just another name for/a type of gunboat diplomacy? Both articles even cite the Don Pacifico affair as examples of the concepts they cover. Seems like they could be merged. 108.34.186.243 (talk) 10:06, 18 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Many actions have indeed overlapped, but seems to me Gunboat Diplomacy is about a threat, explicit or not, to bombard or even invade, with blockade being incidental or even absent, whilst Pacific Blockade is blocking traffic, pure and simple. It's an economic sanction, except it's applied by force. Jim.henderson (talk) 20:09, 22 September 2018 (UTC)Reply