Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
ORD
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a46c11521d9add6d

Jump to content

Talk:PZL P.11

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Piotrus in topic B-class review

Untitled

[edit]

User:Jinxs added the aero-table, hope that's ok w/ u.

Sure. Any idea when is the temporary aero table replaced with a proper infobox? //Halibutt 13:42, 18 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Best airplane in the world briefly, eh? Sources?

You Tube

[edit]

Short clip at:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTHFeNBqyJ4

81.86.144.210 21:16, 20 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Difficult to say, and the engine cover didn't look right. Still maybe in slow montion and zoom 100% can be obtained. --Jinxs 22:35, 20 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


PZL 11 c

[edit]

I've heared that every third PZL 11c was fitted with two 20mm cannons which were synchronised at several hundred meters as they were meant to be used in a stand-off attack on enemy bombers (to out-range the manually operated defensive machineguns of the bombers). Is this true?

Veljko Stevanovich 5. 8. 2007. 8:45 UTC+1

No, it's certainly not true. Piotr Mikołajski 19:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
From Il-2 game I heard that it has machineguns with intentionaly low accuracy/unmatched barrel axises to provide a "shotgun" effect.--Oleg Str (talk) 08:47, 18 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Highly implausible. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 11:43, 18 September 2009 (UTC).Reply

Comparsions

[edit]
Trying to make the comparison to the Junkers Ju-87, an attack aircraft to the PZL. P.11 is illogical. You are comparing two dissimilar types. If you want to make valid comparison, be ready to provide authoritative and valid reference sources. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC).Reply

B-class review

[edit]

This article is currently at start/C class, but could be improved to B-class if it had more (inline) citations.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 03:42, 31 May 2012 (UTC)Reply