Talk:PCMark

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Disclosure

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I am editing this article as a Futuremark employee. I am happy to discuss any issues, questions, changes or suggestions for the article with admins and other users.Tripleblade (talk) 13:14, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

PCMark05

Why is there no mention of the PC mark 05 performance degredation for non-intel products? http://arstechnica.com/reviews/hardware/atom-nano-review.ars/6

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:PCMark

Disclosure

PCMark05