Talk:PC-Lint

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the PC-Lint article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

C/C++ Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject C/C++, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of C and C++ topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.C/C++Wikipedia:WikiProject C/C++Template:WikiProject C/C++C/C++
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article falls within the scope of C.
	This article falls within the scope of C++.

Untitled

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I added a redirect here from FlexeLint. Perhaps those two should be reversed though. Isn't PC-Lint just a win32 binary distribution of FlexeLint? PhilipPaeps (talk) 11:02, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The title ("PC-Lint") and body "PC-lint" are out of sync.

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Gimpel Software is now part of Vector Informatik,^[1] and PC-lint has been re-written as PC-lint Plus.^[2]

References