Talk:PARCC

Controversy section

Shouldn't there be one by now? It's a very controversial test, with protests happening in almost every state that takes the tests. Just googling "PARCC" shows that there are way more than enough reliable sources to back this claim up. Here's one news article, for starters, about the controversy surrounding the tests. Pyrotle {^T/_C} 01:23, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Student Reactions section

I mean, This section has importance, but whoever wrote this section does not have NPOV (Neutral Point of View), and lacks any sources. Also, The reactions extend a lot further than Albuquerque, as the news can attest. This either needs to be re-written or removed. I may do it myself if time permits. Ramos Can't hear you, TYPE LOUDER!! 16:10, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

I would like to add that calling the PARCC a "useless test", although (probably) true, isn't in line with Wikipedia's usual stance on objectivity.

There's plenty of reliable sources out there for the section to stay, though it could be reworded, neutralized, sourced, and renamed "Controversy." I would do it, but I'm not really good at big rewrites like this. Pyrotle {^T/_C} 22:06, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

NPOV issues

Since, no one has made a section for this yet, I'm going to add it.

This article leans in support of PARCC and violates Wikipedia rules on POV. I've added a tag for this article. Coin Collecting John (talk) 03:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)