Talk:Oxidation

Merge?

Maybe this entire article should be merged into redox??

You can't have reduction without oxidation and vice versa.--ZayZayEM 02:37, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I agree. Josh Cherry 03:04, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I agree. Oxidation is not more significant than reduction...why do we have the reduction article redirecting to oxidation? Brianjd 05:35, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)

This article should be merged into redox!!! I would do it myself except I don't know how merges are supposed to be done...I read you shouldn't just copy content because that destroys the history.Brianjd 10:25, Nov 5, 2004 (UTC)

I do not think there is such a complication. There is for moving pages.--ZayZayEM 03:41, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)

What is so complicated about moving pages?

Brianjd 06:10, 2004 Nov 7 (UTC)

I have merged this article into redox.

Brianjd 06:40, 2004 Nov 7 (UTC)

I also agree the articles should be merged. —Lowellian (reply) 06:52, 16 November 2012 (UTC)