Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a28509b44c3ff4d4

Jump to content

Talk:Oxford Circus panic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Robofish in topic Surprisingly good article

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 11:11, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that 16 people were injured fleeing a non-existent terrorist attack during the Oxford Circus panic? Source: "Sixteen people were treated after they were injured fleeing the station, following reports of gunshots being fired on a Central Line platform. There was no evidence any weapons had been fired, police said. [...] Police initially treated the incident as potentially terrorism-related, before standing down." BBC News
    • ALT1:... that pop star Olly Murs falsely told 7.8 million Twitter followers that there had been a shooting inside Selfridges department store during the Oxford Circus panic? Source: "Pop singer Olly Murs, who has 7.8 million Twitter followers tweeted from Selfridges department store: “F**k everyone get out of @selfridges now gun shots!! I’m inside.”" link

Created by Smurrayinchester (talk). Self-nominated at 09:33, 8 September 2020 (UTC).Reply

  • ☑Y Article is long enough (4432 characters), new enough (created 3 September, nominated 8 September), and article is within policy
  • ☑Y Hooks are short enough, interesting, in the article, and well sourced. Either hook is fine
  • ☑Y QPQ done
  • Overall, this nomination passes, congratulations. Very interesting article, I remember this happening. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Surprisingly good article

[edit]

Before I read this article, I would have been sceptical it would be possible to write a good article on an 'event' where basically nothing really happened, that satisfies the notability guidelines, but this one proves otherwise. Good job! (Although there are perhaps a handful of other articles on similar human panics, such as Battle of Los Angeles.) Robofish (talk) 17:25, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply