Talk:Ostromia

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article very speculative

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This is a very speculative article. In my opinion you need a more complete skeleton. This should clearly marked as an assumption, not as an fact!--MBelzer (talk) 19:45, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

There are minor anatomical differences in other Archaeopteryx skeletons too! So you can create more new bird/dinosaur species! I hope you can understand my skepticism about this new species.--MBelzer (talk) 20:09, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

It isn't this article that is speculative, it simply reflects the published description of the genus. FunkMonk (talk) 23:48, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Ostromia

Article very speculative