Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2278cc208770acb

Jump to content

Talk:Osmometer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by 137.53.241.15 in topic Accuracy of various types of osmometers

Merger proposal

[edit]

I propose merging Clifton nanolitre osmometer into Osmometer. The Clifton page is unsourced, and reads like an add, but also contains information and details the Osomometer page could benefit from having, as such I think merging relevant content from there would beneficial. After which the Clifton page could be blanked and deleted. Additionally, some information might be suited to be merged to the linked pages on the Osomometer page.--Tautomers(T C) 05:06, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Freezing point depression osmometer would be a more specific target for the Clifton page, and hence the better target for the merge. Klbrain (talk) 12:06, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  checkY Merge completed Klbrain (talk) 16:12, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Accuracy of various types of osmometers

[edit]

The statement that freezing-point methods are most accurate is not supported by the reference. That reference refers to another report for that claim. The secondary reference does not actually compare different osmometer types at all. It simply compares two dilutions of samples on a single freezing-point type machine. 137.53.241.15 (talk) 22:18, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply