Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22888341c5719ef

Jump to content

Talk:Orthotropic deck

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Dyaimz in topic Railway Bridges

Railway Bridges

[edit]

I removed the reference to railway bridges as I don't believe it. (If someone has a specific example (& citation) then by all means please reinstate it.) Many rail bridges superficially resemble orthotropic decks because they have steel deck plates on cross beams. The deck plates play no part in the strength of the bridge (maybe some small amount but not by design); they simply stop the ballast falling out.

As to reduced deck thickness, rail bridges are more likely to be half-through than road bridges, so the main beams do not add to the deck thickness. The deck thickness is a product of the cross beams which are relatively constant regardless of the main beams.

Finally the loads on a rail bridge are fixed to the line of the rails so there is little advantage to designing for a deck plate as opposed to a road or foot bridge where loads can be spread across the deck. Dyaimz (talk) 21:56, 30 May 2009 (UTC)Reply