Talk:Oriscus
Add topicLatest comment: 10 years ago by 83.197.178.172 in topic The neume in question is probably not an oriscus
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
The neume in question is probably not an oriscus
[edit]It is pointless to discuss the graphic, since its source is not specified. But it looks as already the choice was not suitable for the whole subject. You can verify the different oriscus forms in Solange Corbin's neume table and than chose a better readable reproduction of an earlier source. I recommend this article for deletion, because the discussion of singular neumes makes more sense within the article neume. 83.197.178.172 (talk) 22:30, 13 January 2016 (UTC)