Talk:Order and Chaos
Add topicLatest comment: 9 years ago by Ihardlythinkso in topic Six-in-a-row
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Six-in-a-row
[edit]User:Stephen.sniderman (apparently the game's designer) edited the article to say that "It needs to be emphasized that Order does not win by creating a row of six Xs or six Os." and explaining that four-in-a-row doesn't give a guaranteed victory, although I don't understand their reasoning. User:Fraggle81 reverted it the next day with no explanation. I've restored the first statement (flagging it as unsourced). --McGeddon (talk) 12:57, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- With six-in-a-row no longer a win, a four-in-a-row w/ open ends doesn't force a win: Chaos waits for Order to fill in one of the ends first, then Chaos fills the other end resulting in either four-in-a-row or six-in-a-row. ;) --IHTS (talk) 08:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)