Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2252c324869b23b

Jump to content

Talk:Optical fiber

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Kvng in topic Loss calculation
Former good articleOptical fiber was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 29, 2005Good article nomineeListed
January 16, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
February 11, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

WDM

[edit]

What about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavelength_division_multiplexing  Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.70.35.39 (talk) 19:31, 19 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please add info about color coding of cables/connectors

[edit]

Quote (http://www.thefoa.org/tech/connID.htm): Color Codes: Since the earliest days of fiber optics, orange, black or gray was multimode and yellow singlemode. However, the advent of metallic connectors like the FC and ST made color coding difficult, so colored boots were often used. The TIA 568 color code for connector bodies and/or boots is Beige for multimode fiber, Blue for singlemode fiber, and Green for APC (angled) connectors.

I was looking for this info, but didn't find it on wikipedia.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.228.42.32 (talk) 06:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Equipment costs to be added?

[edit]

I think equipment costs for fusion splicing should be included in the article considering the pieces of equipment involved can exceed £50,000.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.98.76.45 (talk) 14:47, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Contribution

[edit]

The following sections were contributed by 59.161.83.214 (talk · contribs). I don't feel they're ready for inclusion in the article mainly due to WP:OR concerns but maybe someone can improve the material - Talk:Optical fiber/59.161.83.214  Preceding unsigned comment added by Kvng (talkcontribs) 15:36, 7 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Loss calculation

[edit]

Khrapkorr updated an example. The new fiber has a lower loss specification but the example was changed to indicate a lower transmission percentage. Something is inconsistent. ~Kvng (talk) 14:08, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The old example had 8 km of fiber, which did not make much sense to me. I used 10 km, which has -1.48 dB total attenuation at 1550 nm. Now use online dB-% converter and obtain 71.1%. Khrapkorr (talk) 23:22, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
1.48dB ≈ 71% of power.
3 dB ≈ 71% of E-field amplitude. Constant314 (talk) 01:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
-1.48 dB = -.148 B; 10^-.148 = 71.1%. --Zac67 (talk) 06:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, my sanity check overlooked the fact that the new example uses a different length of fiber. ~Kvng (talk) 13:13, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply