Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26fe1369ff0a0d6

Jump to content

Talk:Operation U-Go

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Setergh in topic Japanese casualties

Name

[edit]

Why the name "U-Go"? What does it mean? Languagehat (talk) 15:24, 31 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Inconsistent Casualty Numbers

[edit]

At the top of the article and in the info box it states that the japanese losses were 30,502 dead and 23,003 hospitalized. However under "Impact" it lists 13,376 dead for the japanese. I understand sometimes these numbers can be difficult to estimate and vary across sources, but I think in this case given that the allied casualties match up, those two present vastly different impacts for someone reading about this theatre. One, a pyrrhic victory for the allies, and another an overwhealming victory. Is there a way to resolve this sort of thing?RugnirViking (talk) 18:38, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

G'day, if you can get your hands on the cited sources and can confirm that they are both talking about comparable periods and causes, I'd suggest dealing with it by comparing and contrasting the different figures in the body of the article, then adjusting the infobox to display a range that incorporates the two figures (assuming the sources are reliable). Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 11:56, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Japanese casualties

[edit]

It seems that things like the Battle of Kohima and especially the Battle of Imphal amount to higher causalties than presented here. Why is this? Setergh (talk) 09:55, 28 May 2025 (UTC)Reply