Talk:Operation Southern Watch

Biased?

I'm not sure where this is biased or how to unbias it. The closest thing to a bias I see is the mention that Iraq engaged in several aggressive acts -- but this is a military term, not a political one. The actions of the Iraqi military can be properly classified as aggressions, regardless of the intent. Perhaps rewording the sentence would help?

LordHedgie 23:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

I was the tagger. I agree with you that it's hard to see where it's biased, and I may have been a little too quick on the POV trigger. However, the whole article _feels_ Ameri-centric and imperialist. Don't know how that feeling can be translated into constructive edits though. Rusty 02:22, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

I dont want to attempt to edit the article but i believe the start date is inaccurate. As i am going through my military career, i hand wrote dates at that time as being a part of this operation. I also have photo evidence of me moving ordinance in support of this campaign starting from june/july 1992. Oh well i guess this is why wiki is not citeable. 2601:646:8F00:E0E0:9B42:7419:837D:FD89 (talk) 05:35, 12 October 2025 (UTC)