Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a267ae28cfddfda9

Jump to content

Talk:Operation Security and Order

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by SonOfYoutubers in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SonOfYoutubers talk 17:35, 25 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

  • Source: Abdullah, Taufik; Abdurrachman, Sukri; Gunawan, Restu (2012). Malam Bencana 1965 Dalam Belitan Krisis Nasional: Bagian II Konflik Lokal. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia. p. 214: "Dalam pertempuran yang sangat tidak seimbang ini, pasukan Banteng Wulung melawan tanpa rasa takut, bahkan cenderung konyol dan nekad, karena mereka bergerak maju hanya dengan senjata pentung atau dengan ikat kepala yang dikebut-kebutkan ke arah lawannya". Translation: "In this highly unequal battle, the Banteng Wulung troops fought without fear, even tended to be silly and reckless, as they advanced armed only with clubs or by wildly waving their headbands toward the enemy."
Created by Faldi00 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.

Faldi00 (talk) 07:46, 3 July 2025 (UTC).Reply

  • - looks good to me: Earwig shows up unlikely to be a violation, hook fact checks out per the text mentioned above (AGF that's what the source actually says). Article doesn't look to have major issues otherwise, I'll AGF that the translation is a good one too. And QPQ done. Good work, thanks.   Amakuru (talk) 14:35, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply