Talk:Operation Devil Hunt

Operation Devil Hunt was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 6, 2025, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of crime and criminal biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Changing Infobox

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dont change infobox and reorganize it. Keep it the way it is for transparency CaptShayan (talk) 19:11, 10 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA review

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Unsuccessful. Yue🌙 06:21, 6 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Operation Devil Hunt/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: CaptShayan (talk · contribs) 07:18, 11 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Yue (talk · contribs) 06:21, 6 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The article has a substantial number of grammatical errors and run-on sentences. The tone of the article is also unencyclopedic and reads like a news timeline, particularly in the Background section.
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Most of the article body is contained within the Background section and is about entirely different events that led up to the operation. There are only five sentences about the operation itself, and it is merely a record of the number of arrested.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Only one sentence is dedicated to the accused.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
The article would benefit from the addition of images. There are free images already available of individuals involved in the operation.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Quick failing the article in its current state due to multiple issues. The prose needs to be expanded with much more detail about the article topic itself. The writing is not good and needs significant improvement from a second or third eye. The nominator themself started the article but did not write most of it; this nomination seems premature.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Operation Devil Hunt

Changing Infobox

GA review