Talk:Open finance

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Open Finance/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Fintechfraser (talk · contribs) 23:59, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Phlsph7 (talk · contribs) 08:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello Fintechfraser and thanks for all your improvements to this article. However, despite the improvements, the article fails criterion 2b since there are too many unreferenced paragraphs. Examples are the paragraphs starting with "The concept of Open Finance arose", "The CDR is designed to foster competition", and "The European Union's approach to open finance is guided". According to criterion 2b, these passages require inline citations "no later than the end of the paragraph". Additionally, the article also has the maintenance template "Original research" at the top. I suggest that you add all the relevant references and address the maintenance template before a renomination.

A few other observations

• WP:EARWIG detects no copyvios
• Open Finance refers to the concept and practice expressions like "refers to" should be avoided in the first sentence, see MOS:REFERS
• In July 2022, Colombia has published Decree 1,297 remove "has"

Phlsph7 (talk) 08:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Open Finance or open finance?

Open banking article uses lower case letters (open banking, not Open Banking). Is there a reason to use upper case letters here? Blakocha (talk) 12:54, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Good shout - I've updated this throughout. Fintechfraser (talk) 20:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Open Finance/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Fintechfraser (talk · contribs) 23:38, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: 750h+ (talk · contribs) 08:42, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunately this article has not seen many improvements since its last GAN with unsourced paragraphs, and some suspicious sources. The article seems to be completely AI written, with nearly no hyperlinks. This article is a far way from being a successful GA. Failing. 750h+ 08:42, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Possible AI text

Concerns were raised previously by TNM101 about AI-generated content in this article. This is a procedural talk page section to discuss it. There is no need to ping me in response. Read WP:AISIGNS for more information for why this is tagged; however, note that fixing the issue requires more than just removing the superficial signs.

Rationale by user: Many repeated words and writing style which is reminiscent of AI, GPTzero gave a 100% before the copyedit Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:41, 17 June 2026 (UTC)