Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a226601859dd18aa

Jump to content

Talk:Open Sans

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Riordanmr in topic Low importance?

Low importance?

[edit]

Low importance? Really?? Open Sans is the look of the 2010s, being on 21 million websites and viewed 28.3 billion times last week (this link, alas, is resistant to being archived). It’s the second most popular font on Google Fonts right now. Open Sans is not some obscure monospace programming font with a free-to-download-but-not-open-source license; it’s an open-source font which has, in a big way, defined contemporary culture. Samboy (talk) 07:26, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Reference: https://www.designernews.co/stories/50353-why-all-the-hate-against-open-sans “The only bad thing that Open Sans has is its overuse on the web.” Yeah, I know, it’s a forum and therefore not a reliable source. It’s hard to find reliable sources about fonts on the web; people just don’t write about fonts that much in newspapers, magazines, books, and scholarly journals. Instead, we get news articles about the horrible scandal that a man tried to kiss a woman 50 years ago (no, I am not kidding) instead about things which matter, like fonts and why Open Sans may or may not be a good choice (or maybe Source Sans Pro instead). Samboy (talk) 07:48, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
For what it's worth, I agree with you that this article shouldn't be considered Low-importance. Riordanmr (talk) 04:32, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Reply