Talk:Open Government Licence
Add topicLatest comment: 9 years ago by Mike Linksvayer in topic Other jurisdiction OGLs
 | A fact from Open Government Licence appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 January 2014. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Category here
[edit]There's a category at Category:Open Government Licence files for local files licenced under the OGL; I'm not sure whether it should be linked to from the article anywhere though. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 10:02, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- I say keep it; but it would be good if {{Commons category}} (or a fork) could say
"Wikimedia Commons has media released under OGL"
instead of"Wikimedia Commons has media related to OGL"
. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:10, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Other jurisdiction OGLs
[edit]There are other Open Government Licen[cs]es, several of which are modifications of the UK ones this article is about. Some are listed at http://opendefinition.org/licenses/#other-conformant-licenses ... this might be worth noting in the article if reliable sources can be found. https://theodi.org/blog/the-proliferation-of-open-government-licences is a blog post on the topic. Mike Linksvayer (talk) 16:17, 9 June 2017 (UTC)