Talk:OpenSAF
Add topic | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Apparantly, parts (if not all) of this aricle was written by members of OpenSAF, which has resulted in some "sales speak" within the artciles, such as "leading Communication.... Companies". This should be corrected so that it becumes more neutral. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.112.166.110 (talk) 07:06, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Shouldn't this page be named "OpenSAF" instead of "Opensaf"? W. Craig Trader (talk) 15:56, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
The claim about de-facto standard is invalid. The majority of the Enterprise industry currently uses openais, corosync, linux-ha, and pacemaker combinations to provide HA solutions. Opensaf is neither widely deployed nor widely available from software vendors in the Posix operating system market. On the other hand, openais, corosync, linux-ha, and pacemaker are available on nearly all Posix operating systems by default and widely deployed and field proven for over 5 years or longer.
Links in this article are not good. Link to GoAhead SW indeed goes to a travel company. Is GoAhead SW still in business? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.159.77.166 (talk) 15:19, 10 December 2014 (UTC)