Talk:OpenKM

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo openkm big.gif

Image:Logo openkm big.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:35, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Some notability

See Google test: http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?hl=en&ned=uk&q=OpenKM&ie=UTF-8 --HappyInGeneral (talk) 08:50, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Not neutral

In the introduction it says:

Its architecture allows better management of documents, providing a more flexible, cost-effective alternative.

Which reads more like a promo or maybe copied text from the company.--Ljvillanueva (talk) 02:41, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Free Software?

The article states that OpenKM is distributed under the GNU GPL software license. The home page of OpenKM states Professional support are available on any certified OpenKM installations at the site here but it is not specified what constitutes a 'certified OpenKM installation'. The company seems to advocate OpenKM as free software but they apparently do not support installations installed using the community edition. I think the article should state this as to not mislead people into thinking that the company provides services for a free software installation. Jespertp (talk) 10:12, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

So far, the article omits the fact that OpenKM is available both as a commercial and a community (co-)developed release.Matthiask de (talk) 14:22, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Nav-logo.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2019 (UTC)