Talk:OpenDor Media
Add topic | You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: Parts of this page are restricted Parts of this article are related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
| Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. If it is unclear which parts of the page are covered, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unpacked article
[edit]Why do you keep undoing these valid revisions? The article was clearly biased. 2607:F470:6:3001:B1F9:50E0:3EA5:C168 (talk) 14:04, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
Accusations not supported by sources
[edit]@AscendedGoblin Please explain how your accusations are supported by your source. They are unfounded, and this is defamatory. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 00:56, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- That is not 'my accusation.' The very first sentence of the source defines Nakba denial as "denying Zionist culpability for the mass expulsions of Palestinian Arabs from their homeland in 1948." Noam Weissman does exactly that, and so the narrative he pushes would be characterized by some as Nakba denial.
- I will update that sentence to "This view is criticized by some as a form of Nakba denial" so it reads more neutral. In the future please discuss your disagreements on the talk page here. AscendedGoblin (talk) 01:57, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- That is WP:SYNTH. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:59, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- In addition, several topic-banned editors built up this article, which has serious NPOV violations.Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nakba denial Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 02:05, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- It appears the article you're referring to was kept and I can't seem to find who these "several topic-banned editors" are.
- Aside from that, it is irrelevant because I provided another source AscendedGoblin (talk) 02:15, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Explain how AscendedGoblin (talk) 02:09, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- It's SYNTH because you don't have a reference linking the accused to the accusation. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 02:33, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Your issue had to do with that one sentence about Nakba denial. You did not have justification to delete the entire section. AscendedGoblin (talk) 03:17, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- @AscendedGoblin: you are discussing a contentious topic. Since you do not have 500 edits + 30 days experience, as noted in the notice at the top of this page and the notice on your talk page, you cannot discuss this topic. It is reserved for more experienced editors as there has been much disruption in the past. If you continue to violate contentious topics restrictions, you may have your editing privileges curtailed. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:28, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note to others reading this thread. The contentious topics notice was only placed here at 25 Apr 2025 about 0245 UTC, so only @AscendedGoblin's last comment is after the notice appeared. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:04, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- @AscendedGoblin: you are discussing a contentious topic. Since you do not have 500 edits + 30 days experience, as noted in the notice at the top of this page and the notice on your talk page, you cannot discuss this topic. It is reserved for more experienced editors as there has been much disruption in the past. If you continue to violate contentious topics restrictions, you may have your editing privileges curtailed. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:28, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Your issue had to do with that one sentence about Nakba denial. You did not have justification to delete the entire section. AscendedGoblin (talk) 03:17, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- It's SYNTH because you don't have a reference linking the accused to the accusation. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 02:33, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- In addition, several topic-banned editors built up this article, which has serious NPOV violations.Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nakba denial Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 02:05, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- That is WP:SYNTH. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:59, 25 April 2025 (UTC)