Talk:OpenDOS

On my own talk page, I've received a request to discuss this article. I'm not entirely sure why; I am not its author, though I've done a fair bit of work on it in the past.

Apparently, although it's not flagged for deletion, apparently someone thinks it's a candidate for it. I would welcome discussions as to why. If anything, I think the material in it could benefit from being merged into the DR-DOS article.

Comments? Liam Proven 16:43, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

There seems to be a contradiction here, the sidebar says closed source, but the beginning paragraph mentions that source is available to end users. That may not be Open Source per the OSI definition but it is certainly not closed source, and i would argue it is open source (lowercase). Perhaps we can call this shared source like Microsoft does? Mrsteveman1 (talk) 03:57, 17 June 2008 (UTC)