Talk:OpenBCI

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Definitely notable

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion

There have been countless publications which have used OpenBCI devices (as they are a staple in low-density/low-cost EEG research), so the "may not meet notability" banner is a bit weird to see (although the article would benefit from some improvement). There's a publication list here: https://docs.openbci.com/citations/

- Erik.Bjareholt (talk) 11:30, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

I agree. As of now, there are citations going back 10 years, and there are plenty of new studies published this year. More work does need to be done, but there is clear evidence for notability here. Jcstr (talk) 23:55, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Definitely notable, I agree. I found "OpenBCI" devices on chinese online shops and was glad to see WP explaining what all this is good for. Paulekkk (talk) 06:51, 30 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:OpenBCI

Definitely notable