Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a252f15d8afc224d

Jump to content

Talk:Opalite

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by John-Burrows in topic possible mistakes in article

possible mistakes in article

[edit]

Talk:Beryllium I think opalite is not synthetic. I think it is another name for tiffany stone, an opalized fluorite found in beryllium ore. I found these sites that seem to say it is not synthetic. http://www.earthlyicons.com/opalite.html http://www.bernardine.com/gemstones/opalite.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.220.138.225 (talkcontribs) 00:48, 22 August 2010

Those two websites are commercial gem/jewelry sales pitches and don't qualify as reliable sources. What you need are non-commercial references. Vsmith (talk) 01:22, 22 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Opalite has been used to describe natural stones before there were widespread synthetics. It has been used to describe material that has simalar characteristics to opal without calling it opal directly. Much the same way the term chalcedony might be used (or misused!) I would not be against this being merged into the opal article, unless there is a complete article about manufactured opals. Nodekeeper (talk) 03:55, 16 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

There is definitely an artificial form of glass called 'Opalite' - unfortunately, it does appear that there is also a genuine stone which does appear to be Tiffany Stone. The photos on the mindat reference are this genuine mineral. I have added a photo of the glass itself to the article. John-Burrows (talk) 18:06, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply