Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24c72583c64f4d4

Jump to content

Talk:Onirism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by 95.77.105.30 in topic Chicken or egg?

The article needs a lot of copyediting, but the subject is notable. (I personally did not edit anything in it at the time I am writing this.) For now, I've sourced and provided context in the article on Dumitru Țepeneag (note that Onirism is the topic of comments in many cultural and political magazines, and the investigation there only dealt with one representative of the trend). I'll therefore be removing the notability tag. Dahn 23:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Can someone please improve this article! Seriously, how could you not write about a common medical condition for 10 years! There is so much material about it in Academic Google! I'm too busy with my native language Wikipedia (portuguese) to write more than a few lines. EternamenteAprendiz (talk) 14:23, 3 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Think it's a school of literature (a literary group), rather than a medical condition. I'll work on it today.--Wi2g (talk) 14:52, 3 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Chicken or egg?

[edit]

Looks like the medical meaning was inspired by the literary one, rather than the other way round; I can't find enough sources, though, to justify spinning off the medical definition into a separate article. Maybe it should be moved to Wiktionary?--Wi2g (talk) 16:28, 3 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

The medical term was most probably the first. But the problem is that Dumitru Țepeneag referred to the movement in his essays as "aesthetic" or "structural" onirism (isn't the form "oneirism" more common than "onirism" in English?). By the way, he did not launch a manifesto in France, as he did not want onirism to be confused with Surrealism. This is a Post-Surrealist movement, they rejected automatic writing (not embrace it) and react against Surrealist literature. The idea was to create texts that would not transcribe dreams, but use the laws of dreaming like in the paintings of certain Surrealist painters (who did not use automatic techniques), so that dream becomes an "aesthetic criteria".

--95.77.105.30 (talk) 16:28, 1 September 2014 (UTC)Reply