Talk:Oneok Field

Classification

I think this article meets the criteria for Start class and have upgraded the classification accordingly. Perhaps it should even be put in Class C.Bruin2 (talk) 18:10, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ONEOK Field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110225233252/http://oneokfield.com/ to http://oneokfield.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Move discussion notice

An article renaming discussion is taking place at Talk:ONEOK that affects this page. The discussion of the proposal should take place on that page, not here, so that all the discussion can be found together. —BarrelProof (talk) 21:47, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:ONEOK which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 08:46, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Capitalization of naming sponsor

I work in digital communications at ONEOK, Inc., the naming‑rights sponsor for ONEOK Field, and am posting with a disclosed conflict of interest.

The article currently refers to the naming sponsor as “Oneok.” ONEOK is conventionally styled in all caps, and I’m requesting a capitalization correction to all instances of “ONEOK” where it refers to the naming sponsor. Per Wikipedia’s Manual of Style on capitalization, acronyms and company names are capitalized as they appear in the majority of reliable, independent sources.

Independent sources such as News On 6 consistently use “ONEOK” in all caps when referring to the naming sponsor and “ONEOK Field,” which supports updating the capitalization per MOS:CAPS. Link: https://www.newson6.com/story/5e3675202f69d76f620866bb/oneok-wins-naming-rights-to-new-ballpark ONEOK Comms MC (talk) 18:57, 31 March 2026 (UTC)