Talk:One-north MRT station

Fair use rationale for Image:NS logo.jpg

Image:NS logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Aljunied MRT Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:One-north MRT station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 13:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: CosXZ (talk · contribs) 22:00, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Lead

• no comments here

History

• Although the steering committee was concerned that this realignment might reduce the development potential of the surrounding land, the development group suggested mitigating this issue by increasing the land density instead. all "this"s should be converted to "the"s

Details

• link cathedral
• link Las Vegas
• link UV exposure

Sources

• what makes TODAYonline Blogs reliable?
  • It's a blog of a news website, which is still reliable in my view since it still involves journalists from said news outlet
• there is three variations of the LTA in sources: one has www.lta.gov.sg, two have LTA , and five have Land Transport Authority.
  • Fixed all to Land Transport Authority
• Earwig shows a 12.3%.
• [1] and [2] has a broken archive
  • I fixed for [2]. [1] should actually still work for if you click on it, it should download a document.

Addressed the above comments.--ZKang123 (talk) 03:07, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.