Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a225200188bb97b7

Jump to content

Talk:Omega language

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How can membership of $\omega$-regular languages be decidable?

[edit]

If you say something is decidable unqualified then that means it's decidable by a Turing Machine. There is no way that membership of the language $\{a\}^\omega$ over the alphabet $\Sigma=\{a,b\}$ is decidable by a Turing machine. The articles on similar topics seem to make similar dubious or incorrect claims.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.172.100.253 (talk) 17:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


It's perfectly standard usage to extend the concept of decidability to other models of computation. See paragraph 2 of Recursive language. In this case, as the text explains, these languages are decidable with a Buchi automaton.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.252.62.244 (talk) 16:51, 18 October 2018 (UTC)Reply