Talk:Old Charges

Duplicate coverage?

Hypersite, this article appears to have a significant overlap with Masonic manuscripts. I was going to tag for a merge and redirect but I am not sure of the extent to which any content (or references) in this new article adds significantly to that of the other article. Could you review this please? AllyD (talk) 10:47, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello @AllyD, my original intent was to create a full and complete article dedicated to the old charges, since the section on old charges within the manuscripts page is rather short compared to the amount of material that could be expanded upon.

Unfortunately I haven't had the time to dedicate to this article recently, but I should soon be able to continue the work and make this a full-fledged article, which would make it too lengthy to fit as a section of another page and deserves a dedicated page befitting its depth and significance, in my humble estimation. HyperSite (talk) 08:37, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Hi, Is there no images that could go in, brighten it. Its is a great article.

scope_creepTalk 12:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

LLM claim

Miiversal, you placed a tag suggesting that this is an AI-generated article. Can you provide a rationale here, so that your finding can be assessed and discussed? In the meantime, I am reverting the tag. AllyD (talk) 19:55, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

This is the rationale. Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:08, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Requested move 20 May 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 14:40, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

---

Old Charges (Freemasonry) → Old Charges – Perhaps the article doesn't need "Freemasonry" in parentheses in the title because there are apparently no other things on the English Wikipedia called "Old Charges". 2804:388:E059:C7CD:0:5F:C499:1101 (talk) 00:42, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

• Support. The base name Old Charges is a redirect to Masonic manuscripts#Old Charges where Old Charges (Freemasonry) is listed as the main article. Given this, the main article should certainly be at the base name. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:05, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.