Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2440b09bcac1ec6

Jump to content

Talk:Officer candidate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Favonian in topic Requested move

Untitled

[edit]

Just thought I'd make the comment that Marine Corps Officer Candidates ought be represented on here also.

Pay

[edit]

The officer candidates are paid as an E-5, not an E-6. As a current officer candidate myself, I certainly wish that we were paid as E-6's, but alas, we're only sergeants. Erudy 15:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Actually, Army Officer Candidates are paid as E-6's. Army ROTC cadets are paid as E-5's. I was a ROTC cadet for a little while before I switched to OCS (where I graduated and received my commission.) RLMorgan (talk) 23:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
When did you go through? I went through Army OCS and as of my graduation a year and a half ago, the pay was still E5Erudy (talk) 07:15, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I went through 3 years ago. Did you attend a State or Federal program? That might be the difference, possibly. RLMorgan (talk) 19:34, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Commissioning Process

[edit]

As far as the Army is concerned, when you graduate OCS and accept your commission as a 2LT, you are actually discharged from your enlisted contract and appointed as an officer. So, it's not simply a "promotion" from E-whatever to O-1. I corrected this for the U.S. Army section but I'm not sure about the other branches that still say "promoted". Maybe someone from these other branches could clarify and correct (if needed)? RLMorgan (talk) 01:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

India

[edit]

In India they are Gentleman Cadets and the Academies include Indian Military Academy, Officers Training Academy etc —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.162.16.1 (talk) 06:36, 26 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

[edit]

Both articles talk about the same thing, which is describing would-be officers. As Officer Candidate is the more common name and the one used in the NATO STANAG 2116 document, Officer Designate should be merged with this page. Moreover, the term OF(D) used in the officer designate article is no longer used by NATO.--Officer781 (talk) 06:31, 4 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Officer candidate. Uncontested for a week; no indication that title is a proper noun; consistent with solid majority of members in Category:Military ranks. Favonian (talk) 16:26, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply


Officer CandidateOfficer candidate – For consistency with Officer cadet, Second lieutenant, First lieutenant, etc. –PatPeter 00:34, 1 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.