Talk:Oblation

Untitled

When I first tripped over this article, it contained an extensive rant about the former Cardinal Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict the whatever. Though I don't like the pope much either, I don't think a rant against him belongs in this article. So I deleted it. 66.92.73.217 05:36, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

And then, after I edited the post, someone immediately appeared and put the content back. What's up with that? 66.92.73.217 05:39, March 6, 2007 (UTC)

It was blanking. I didn't see an edit summary. If you believe this is a WP:BLP violation as it is unsourced, please put it in the edit summary. Removing content without an ediut summary will usually result in a quick reversal. There was nothing wrong with your edit except that it wasn't jsutified. --Tbeatty 05:41, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. I'm still learning my way around this. 66.92.73.217 05:51, March 6, 2007 (UTC)

Ablation

Should a link be added for people looking for the "removal of material from the surface of an object by vaporization, chipping, or other erosive processes"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.250.252.153 (talk) 20:37, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

In popular culture section

This looks like info for a media franchise that is written in an in-universe style and is uncited; can anyone put it into the appropriate article and not on this page? Rebel shadow 22:03, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Agreed, it's WAY too big for something so tangetial to the rest of the article. I'll pare it back.Euchrid (talk) 02:47, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oblation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080615045105/http://web.ukonline.co.uk/ephrem/lit-james.htm to http://www.ocf.org/OrthodoxPage/liturgy/liturgy.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:27, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Human Sacrifice?

Why is human sacrifice a relevant related topic? Other than a pejorative anti-liturgical insinuation I can think of no reason. That is to say, I see no justifiable reason for that to be there, and its implicit insult against a religious practice a very good reason it ought not be. 2601:346:580:4160:5676:D915:BC91:52D2 (talk) 03:12, 22 May 2025 (UTC)