Talk:Object detection
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by 114.122.40.223 in topic Hilangkan spam saya
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | The content of Object-class detection was merged into Object detection on 12th November 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Delete and Redirect
[edit]This page should be deleted and the name should redirect to Object_recognition_(computer_vision). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.74.64.55 (talk) 19:46, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Blog sourcing
[edit]The distinction between one shot and two shot object detection is an important one. There is no commercial promotion in the text. Since the article asks for secondary and tertiary sources rather than primary ones, I used blogs that interpret the primary sources.
Sonata19 (talk) 17:10, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- See WP:RS. Self published sources such as blog posts are not acceptable sources on Wikipedia, outside of very limited exceptions which do not apply in this case. You should especially not be using vendor sources such as viso.ai - MrOllie (talk) 17:20, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- To be clear, you should not keep restoring this with citations like viso.ai and towardsdatascience - MrOllie (talk) 22:12, 6 July 2021 (UTC)