Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2293b603b1ccf36

Jump to content

Talk:Oakham

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 20 years ago by SiGarb in topic "Oakhamist"? or Oakhamian?
OpenStreetMap held a mapping party in this area on 14-15 October 2006 to make a creative commons licensed map that may be used in Wikipedia articles.

Thanks to all those wikipedians that took part.

See http://www.openstreetmap.org for details of other planned mapping parties.

"Oakhamist"? or Oakhamian?

[edit]

I have never heard the term "Oakhamist" used, or seen it in print before. Oakham School had a school magazine called The Oakhamian and its ex-pupils are called Old Oakhamians []. This seems a more probable adjective/noun formation (and certainly sounds better). The suffix "-ist" usually indicates that the person performs some action (eg motorist), or job/trade/profession (eg typist, physicist, hypnotist), or is an advocate for, or follower of, a particular belief or teaching (eg socialist), or has a specific trait or tendency (eg purist), or prejudice (eg ageist, sexist). Simply belonging to/living in/coming from a place doesn't seem to fall into any of these categories (although a Wykehamist is an ex-pupil of Wykeham's School, it seems to indicate a follower of Wykeham's teachings). I suppose an enthusiastic promotor of Oakham's virtues and attractions might be called an Oakhamist, but an ordinary inhabitant is surely something else: I'd suggest following the school's example and using "Oakhamian". SiGarb 16:27, 30 December 2005 (UTC)Reply