Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22ad519da13284b

Jump to content

Talk:OGK-2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Truthanado in topic Power versus energy

Power versus energy

[edit]

Could someone please check the following statement in the article, in particular the unit used:

"The power output of the OGK-2 power plants in 2007 was around 48 TW."

It seems there may be a confusion between power (watts) and energy (watt-hours). Considering the 5 power listed plants output 8,700 MW (or 8.7 GW), it is inconceivable that they could somehow output 48 TW (4,800 GW or 4,800,000 MW). Perhaps the sentence should correctly read:

"The power output of the OGK-2 power plants in 2007 was around 48 TWh."

Having worked in the electrical power industry for several years, this is a common mistake. Power is an instantaneous value; energy is power integrated over time.

Thanks. Truthanado (talk) 00:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply