Talk:Nvidia

Finances

Can someone pls check the figures decimal point writing (dot or colon), in the chapter Finances ? Sums of trillions $ (colon) leave me with quite a little doubt. Or if correct, then maybe switch to write thousand-billions without decimal point ?

Second paragraph in Open-source software support is not correctly formated

The second paragraph is written with two external links and some weird chevrons which does not correspond to any MediaWiki syntax.

We could a tone template but I don't think it's quite what I am looking for. Otthorn (talk) 09:02, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

nivida board around 2016

Nivida board in 2016? While Nivida began with mainly US board members by 2016 thereabouts numbers of Chinese greatly increased. My recolllection; can anyone confirm.　 ~2026-43056-71 (talk) 23:54, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Toyota partnership sentence in the "Litigation" section

The "Litigation" section currently includes a sentence about Nvidia's 2017 partnership with Toyota to use the Drive PX platform for autonomous vehicles.

Since this appears to describe a business and product-development partnership rather than a legal dispute, would it make more sense to move the sentence out of "Litigation" and into the "Products and development" section, possibly under the 2016–2019 period?

This would keep the "Litigation" section focused on legal matters while preserving the Toyota information elsewhere in the article. Would there be any objections to moving it? ChaeyoungYoon (talk) 09:32, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

Reworking needed due to article reorganisation on 12 August 2026

I haven't delved into the entirety of what was done in the major article reorganisation on 12 August 2026, but it has disrupted the flow of the article. For example, some bits of the History section now assume knowledge that was formerly earlier in the section, but has been moved to another section lower in the article. Some editing (how much, I don't know) is needed to restore the flow. Nurg (talk) 02:15, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Neutrality of the -Data scraping and Anna's Archive piracy- section? + Category NPOV?

The secton with the heading says "piracy" in Wikipedia's own voice. The case of Nazemian v. NVIDIA, is live litigation as far as I can tell from google and Nvidia has filed a motion to dismiss as it states, shouldn't the title be more neutral like "Copyright litigation over AI training data? It says Nvidia has been involved in heavy data scraping for illegal AI model training. but this is what is currently being argued right so is this not a question for WP:NPOV or WP:ASSERT. Also seems like "heavy" is editorialising?

Also "Open-source software support": As such, Nvidia has been notable for proprietization and vendor-locking practices. has no source as far as I can tell... I think better to discuss here than make edits with a decision on how what I know are contentious topics.

I also saw that the article is in Category:Companies involved in the Gaza war, but I couldn't find anything in the article that supports that? Also won't touch and thought beter to highlight here. IndrasBet (talk) 14:15, 15 September 2026 (UTC)