Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a250bb50aa0fa53e

Jump to content

Talk:Numidian cavalry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Lmscarrott in topic Flowery Language

Untitled

[edit]

Problem with Livy quote

In the lede: "they were described by the Roman historian Livy as "by far the worst horsemen in Africa."[1]"

A reference to a specific passage in Ab Urbe Condita is given. I suspected a faulty translation for the word rendered as "worst", so I decided to look up the given passage, both in Latin and in translation. No statement even loosely related to the 'quote' in the lede is to be found anywhere in book XXIX. I suspect the entire quote is either mis-referenced or entirely bogus. At the very least, the citation does not hold up. 82.176.221.176 (talk) 11:01, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sources

[edit]

There is no single source cited in this article, which is online availble or reliable. Maybe the whole article should be deleted. Best wishes Minoo (talk) 15:12, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

The quote is correct and not "bogus" as claimed by the editor who removed it. The citation was off by one chapter; it is AUC Book 29, Chapter 34, not Chapter 35.
The relevant text is here: https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.02.0148%3Abook%3D29%3Achapter%3D34
"the Numidians, who are by far the first horsemen in Africa." 172.79.43.58 (talk) 02:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Flowery Language

[edit]

The language in the last paragraph of the Second Punic War section is ridiculously romantic and subjective. Does it contain anything of value or should it just be deleted? Lmscarrott (talk) 11:32, 23 April 2025 (UTC)Reply