Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22dee155a3c22ce

Jump to content

Talk:Nuclear utilization target selection

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 months ago by NPguy in topic NUTS is not strategy

why is it

[edit]

why is it, that those nuclear-holocaust-programs all have such strange acronyms ?? NUTS (=crazy) MAD (=crazy) ??? gallows humour anyone ?-- ExpImptalkcon 23:35, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Probably true. I guess the idea for this strategy was born in some politicans head, and when he told the gernerals to work it out they just told each other that this was totally nuts cause it couldnt work. And now they just had to find words for the letters ... and come on ":Nuclear utilization target selection" doesnt make much sense- but NUTS describes it pretty well —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.178.182.94 (talk) 20:51, 16 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

My 2 cents: it could also be a reference to Colonel Joseph H. Harper; when asked to surrender to the Wehrmacht during the battle of Bastogne his response letter to the Germans said simply "Nuts!". Could make sense. 70.81.89.66 (talk) 05:45, 12 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

From the wiki page on Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD): "The strategy of Mutually Assured Destruction and the acronym MAD are due to John von Neumann (1903–1957)[11] and his taste for humorous acronyms, another example being his MANIAC computer."94.175.244.252 (talk) 08:07, 8 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Not a hoax

[edit]

I've removed the hoax template from this article as I was able to find many google books and google scholar sources for it. I've added one as a reference. ascidian | talk-to-me 10:41, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nuclear utilization target selection. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:52, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

NUTS is not strategy

[edit]

NUTS is an acronym invented for PR purposes to critique the critics of MAD, who believed in counterforce targeting strategies. It was intended to paint those strategies as at least as crazy as MAD. It seems like overkill (pun intended) to have a separate article on an invented term. NPguy (talk) 20:56, 23 February 2026 (UTC)Reply