Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a284b847b9574b2a

Jump to content

Talk:Nuaulu language

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 January 2019 and 23 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): J.ramos23.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Syllable N

[edit]

The section on Phonotacticds describes (N) as both being part of a syllable and being a syllable itself. This is confusing and should be resolved. Kevinbaet (talk) 22:05, 17 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Adjectives

[edit]

The introductory paragraph to Morphology states that there are no adjectives in Nuaulu, but then the term is nonetheless used in quotations marks, which is confusing. Kevinbaet (talk) 22:05, 17 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Clarify terminology in verb section

[edit]

The intro sentence to the section on verbs should be rewritten. It doesn't make much sense as is. (What is involvement and amount?) Later on, the term "point of view" is used, but it's not obvious what is meant by that. In the section on reduplication, it seems that the two types are full and partial reduplication, but that's not entirely clear from the wording. Kevinbaet (talk) 22:05, 17 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reconstruction level

[edit]

The noun section compares Nuaulu words to earlier proto-forms, which are labeled Proto-Austronesian. However, the classification of the proto-forms appear to be wrong, e.g. because Proto-Austronesian has no phoneme *v. What level of reconstruction do those words represent? Proto-Oceanic? Kevinbaet (talk) 10:45, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Reply