Talk:November Project

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tatumhartwig. Peer reviewers: Mshuttles.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Review

Looking good! I did some copyediting and might have left a few templates. Next steps could include an:

• infobox
• more categories?
• a photo?
• make sure it's not a Wikipedia:Orphan. -Reagle (talk) 21:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

---

Peer Review

I thought this was very well done. I made a few small changes with wording but couldn't find much else wrong with it. I liked the anecdote about the Google Doc in the first paragraph. I find that it helps capture the grass-roots beginnings of the project. The table of workout sites is very useful, especially with the ability to sort the columns alphabetically/chronologically. This would help the average user quickly locate an area near them if they were interested in participating. If you wanted to add more information, I would suggest going over the nature of the workouts, whether it be about how they are selected or if there are varying degrees of difficulty. You might also want to discuss the mission statement that the group may have made outlining their motivation for executing this format on such a grand scale. Pictures of some of the more well known workout sites could also be useful, seeing as the on-location nature of the workouts is what makes the November Project so unique. Good job overall though! Micheletti.t (talk) 17:36, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Peer Review

Hey Tatum, your article looks good so far. The layout is very clean & clear and I especially like your use of the wikitable. Moving forward I might suggest adding in an infobox, which could include a logo, a link to the November Project site, and some basic takeaway. Aside from minor copy edit your article otherwise looks good--lots of good content backed by plenty of reliable sources. Mshuttles (talk) 17:40, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Peer review

Nice article! A few suggestions: - In one place, the article notes that there are now 43 tribes, while in another it still says 40. Perhaps a new source and a modification are in order. - The Boston perspective may be somewhat overrepresented. For example, one section refers to where the Boston workouts take place. Perhaps it would be preferable to say that various cities host their workouts in different locations, then use Boston as an example. - Citation #5 takes us to the November Project Twitter rather than a source that describes the collaboration that you have described. All the best! Mil.sch (talk) 01:18, 20 September 2017 (UTC)Mil.sch

Table of locations versus WP:NOTDIR

The table of locations, all of which are self-referenced, appears to me to violate the "Wikipedia is not..." tenet Wikipedia is not a directory. Having a list of cities involved may be acceptable, when referenced by independent reliable sources, but a place-by-place and day-of-week roster seems to go past what's allowed. ☆ Bri (talk) 05:24, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

I anticipate that it would be possible to independently source a number of those entries (example), but I'd agree the specific locations are probably not needed (and very likely outdated). Nikkimaria (talk) 04:30, 28 May 2026 (UTC)