Talk:Notion (productivity software)
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
As a summary
[edit]It mentions project management. However, it was a description of a part of the function, and it was deleted because it was judged to be unsuitable. Mocha c jp (talk) 00:22, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Notability
[edit]This article requires some additional text explaining why this software is notable. For instance, who uses it, if it was featured anywhere, praised by anyone, how many monthly active users it has and so on 223.191.19.18 (talk) 13:23, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA23 - Sect 202 - Thu
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2023 and 14 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): CORNELIAST (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by CORNELIAST (talk) 23:39, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Name of the article
[edit]domain of the company is notion.so. it seems it could be the name of the company/product like any.do. Domain is so deliberately weird/unusual, it seems it is part of the name. 185.18.60.170 (talk) 21:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Should the pricing section/info be removed?
[edit]The pricing section currently has just two sentences, both of which are backed up by primary sources. I'd argue pricing information should probably be avoided unless it's mentioned by several independent, reliable secondary sources. Even still, having a dedicated section to it for so little information might not be needed at all unless it's really that important.
— TrulyFlawed (talk) 02:38, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
- It's pretty trivial info - anyone who reads the article and is interested in the product will just go to their website to learn these details. No need for it. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 06:59, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
- Honestly that's fair enough. I'll go ahead and remove it now, thanks! — TrulyFlawed (talk) 05:47, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Link error?
[edit]I'm totally not an expert, so I am not qualified to change it, but I am 90+% sure that the link to kanban goes to the wrong page. It almost certainly should go to the Kanban (development) page. MikeSWeston (talk) 22:17, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
- In this context, I've instead changed the link to Kanban board because it seems more specific to what the article refers to. Thank you for pointing this out :3 TrulyFlawed (talk) 23:40, 9 May 2026 (UTC)