Talk:Nothobranchius

New paper

Studies the variation in their ear structures:

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0112459

©Geni (talk) 02:01, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Etymology belongs in etymology section, not lead

The sentence on etymology at the beginning of the article should be removed (I tried and do not want to engage in an edit war), the information is already in the etymology section and should be formatted to be consistent with the MOS guidance on linguistic glosses: MOS:SINGLE.

@~2025-37843-14 @~2025-37785-83 @~2025-37748-37, if you disagree, then please discuss. MossOnALog^Talk 17:09, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

How does that bother you? ~2025-38105-68 (talk) 18:58, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

It's not an issue of my opinion or what bothers me, it's an issue regarding consistency with other taxonomic articles and conformity to the MOS on formatting and recommendations on flow of article content. MossOnALog^Talk 19:05, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Please contribute to the discussion to arrive at a consensus before making further edits per the Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. MossOnALog^Talk 14:55, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

I am going to interpret the lack of response as consensus to stick with the etymology information not being in the first sentence as well as formatting any information to be consistent with the manual of style (MOS:WAW and MOS:SINGLE). MossOnALog^Talk 16:10, 9 December 2025 (UTC)