Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a220d9b12e5a994c

Jump to content

Talk:Nothhelm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Ealdgyth in topic GA Review
Good articleNothhelm has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 9, 2011Good article nomineeListed

Rewrite

[edit]

See Nothelm/Temp. --Quuxplusone 00:58, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Nothhelm/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ironholds (talk) 13:25, 8 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • "it was Nothhelm that gathered materials" - Nothhelm that, or Nothhelm who?
  • "was an Anglo-Saxon Archbishop of Canterbury in medieval England" - seems a bit extraneous. Just "A medieval English Archbishop of Canterbury"?
  • "After his death he was considered a saint." - considered a saint, or was he actually sent through the whole kit and kaboodle of the catholic church? if the latter, note it - if the former, add "although he was never.." etc.
  • Link "pallium"
  • "He held a synod in 736 or 737, which drew nine bishops. It also adjudicated a dispute over the ownership of a monastery located at Withington" - "He held a synod in 736 or 737, which drew nine bishops and adjudicated a dispute over the ownership of a monastery located at Withington".
  • "but yet the synod still rendered judgement in the ownership without secular oversight" - clarify?
  • I've dealt with all of the above, except for the "considered a saint" part. He predates the "formal" procedures - so I've linked to canonization, but the correct term is indeed "considered a saint", as he never went through a formal process, but is still carried on the various lists as a saint. Ealdgyth - Talk 12:54, 9 May 2011 (UTC)Reply