Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21d9e3d49a8962d

Jump to content

Talk:Normalized number

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Jacobolus in topic Should this be merged to Scientific notation?

Should this be merged to Scientific notation?

[edit]

This single-source article is currently incomprehensible unless someone first reads Scientific notation (or previously knew its content), and currently does not say anything that isn't already in the section Scientific notation § Normalized notation; this makes it superfluous, in my opinion. It doesn't seem that useful or even notable as a stand-alone concept.

If nobody has ideas about something significant more to say about this topic, I wonder if it wouldn't be better to just redirect this title to Scientific notation § Normalized notation. That section could still grow to 2–3x its current size without growing out of scope for that page.

Doing a literature search, I can't find many pre-Wikipedia sources discussing this topic under this name. Most of the sources popping up are using "normalized number" as a synonym for normal number in discussing (mostly binary) floating-point. –jacobolus (t) 20:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply